Thursday, August 27, 2015

J.P. Uses the food bank, New GoFundMe page is setup

I couldn't believe this when I heard it, but in the wake of Mr. Justice Walker's scathing indictment of this individual, William Strickland, who was PROMOTED to a Community Service Manager (CSM) position in Victoria, while the mom J.P. and her four kids he removed for 2-1/2 years, is hitting the food bank!  OMG!

Meanwhile, MCFD refuses to provide ANY remedial services to the J.P. family, as noted by this Vancouver Sun article by Ian Mulgrew, where he notes mom has to feed her kids from the food bank, and MCFD is sniffing around to see if they can remove her kids again. It seems that MCFD WANTS her to break fnancially and spiritually so they can scoop up her kids again. What is WRONG with MCFD? Why does an entirely new batch of social workers continue persecuting this family in spite of the public disgust of the social workers Mr. Justice Paul Walker has named, who he found were guilty of malicious persecution and misfeasance?

Besides J.P. having to feed her family from the food bank, I see that someone on behalf of the family has started a GoFundMe page! At least someone cares, but it sure isn't ANYONE at the Ministry of Children and Family Development! Apparently MCFD and the B.C. Liberal Christy Clark government has millions more dollars to appeal, but nothing for a family that B.C. Supreme Court Justice Paul Walker determined social workers maliciously hounded since late 2009. Crazy.

J.P. and 4 kids - GoFundMe donation site

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

Alberta Freedom of Informarion Commissioner Appeals to Federal Court

ALBERTA - a federal legal challenge has been launched by the Freedom of Information commissioner to prevent government ministries from hiding documentation under a client-solicitor claim of privilege. The Alberta government challenged and overturned a Court of Queens Bench ruling that said the government can't hide publicly-paid-for documents. So now, that potentially devastating precedent-setting ruling must be corrected, or government will continue running amok.

It is interesting that in the recent lawsuit against the BC child protection business, J.P. vs. MCFD, a LOT of court time was devoted to several issues of claim of privilege.

The Province completely waived claim of privilege and threw the MCFD contract lawyer Corrine Feenie under the bus in hopes the judge would blame her for the faulty advice she gave MCFD relating to allowing a pedophile dad to have unsupervised access to his four kids he molested, against the explicit Order of Mr. Justice Walker, instead of finding the social workers guilty of misfeasance. That didn't work.

Then there was the issue of mom's former lawyer who was upset she fired his useless ass, and he responded by walking over to the Vancouver Police Department Ms. Crappy Investigator Gwen Rowley to violate his client-solicitor privilege to allude mom was nuts. The Province wanted THAT claim of privilege lifted to bolster their garbage case that rested entirely on mom suffering from a mental illness, and therefore posing a life and death danger to her four children. MCFD jerks.

With the lifting of the otherwise hidden government documents,  there were several extremely incriminating documents in the hands of  MCFD lawyers that were instrumental in helping Justice Walker create the extensive reasons for judgment that he did. 341 pages long of reasons.

It is absolutely vital that government entities, servants of taxpayers, NOT be allowed to hide and destroy incriminating documents that reveal their wrongdoing.

Newly minted NDP Alberta Premiere Notely likely has a vested interest in this appeal, as there is suspicion the outgoing PC public servants were busy destroying incriminating files that would indict several individuals if they were to be made public.

Friday, August 7, 2015

MCFD appealing their lawsuit loss to mom J.P.

VANCOUVER - MCFD is appealing the J.P. lawsuit against them. The main concern is the precedent-setting nature of the case. Because, this finding of misfeasance, the first ever in Canada, means that other workers may similarly find themselves in hot water.

Consider if you will, the relatively brief involvement of the primary instigator of this case, social worker William Strickland (who has since been promoted and given a huge raise as a CSM - Community Service Manager).

The way this jerk worked is absolutely not any different than the vast majority of cases where parents have been victimized by social workers with fraudulent reasons for removal.

On one side, you have the BC Government directly challenging the judicial authority of the B.C. Supreme Court. MCFD social workers currently use the CFCSA and the Provincial Court jurisdiction to SUSPEND any existing BC Supreme Court Orders while they play around in there little sandbox and stretch out proceedings for as long as they can.

There should be no doubt the stakes will be very high here. The BC Supreme Court, and this includes the Court of Appeal, needs to teach the Province a lesson. I'm sure they will.

But, consider that child protection is a behemoth that is Federally subsidized, you can bet if the BC Court of Appeal spanks MCFD, they will simply appeal to the federal court and plea that the "chilling" effect of making social workers accountable for their acts will cause them to remove fewer children, when, even as a precaution, they should be removed regardless of error.

This concept is the underlying tenant of child protection. Removal of children even by error, has continually been deemed an acceptable cost, in order to ensure that "fewer" children fall through the cracks.

However, financial motive is never discussed. Who, in their right minds spends 10 times what it should really cost taxpayers, if the investigation was done properly in the first place, families were helped BEFORE removing children, and so on?

We have said this for years, the ENTIRE POINT is to consume as much taxpayer dollars as possible in the BUSINESS of child protection. This wanton violation of civil, human and charter rights, child protection, is the gateway to a full on assault of such freedoms by government on citizens.

Citizens can't be allowed to win.

Prove me wrong. Lets see if BC doesn't take this to the Supreme Court of Canada.